1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 475 kg more than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | 300 | Livina |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 52 L |