1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 5,461 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 300 | R |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5461 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 382 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 80 L |
