1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | 300 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 60 L |