1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jaguar |
| Model | 300 | XF |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 70 L |
