1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (294 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Kia |
Model | 300 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2845 mm |