1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Musso is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Musso. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 71 kg more than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Because 2010 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | SsangYong |
Model | 300 | Musso |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2001 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 70 L |