1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (178 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 661 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volkswagen |
Model | 300 | Polo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1269 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2470 mm |