1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Ram (310 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Ram weights approximately 377 kg more than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Dodge |
Model | 300 | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2307 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3569 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 98 L |