1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
| Model | 300 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 165 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 65 L |
