1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 374 kg more than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 100 L |