1962 MG 1100 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1962 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1962 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 285 kg more than 1962 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1962 MG 1100 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | MG | Ford |
Model | 1100 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2540 mm |