1962 MG 1100 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG 1100 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1962 MG 1100. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1962 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1962 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 MG 1100 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
| Make | MG | Rover |
| Model | 1100 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2750 mm |
