1962 MG 1100 vs. 2011 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1962 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1962 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 522 kg more than 1962 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1962 MG 1100 | 2011 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | MG | Daewoo |
Model | 1100 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |