1962 Mini MK I vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1979 Toyota Celica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Celica weights approximately 565 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1979 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mini MK I | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mini | Toyota |
| Model | MK I | Celica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2640 mm |
