1962 Mini MK I vs. 1994 Opel Tigra
To start off, 1994 Opel Tigra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Opel Tigra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Opel Tigra (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Opel Tigra should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Opel Tigra weights approximately 495 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Opel Tigra (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1994 Opel Tigra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mini MK I | 1994 Opel Tigra | |
Make | Mini | Opel |
Model | MK I | Tigra |
Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2440 mm |