1962 Mini MK I vs. 2001 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2001 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Saab 05-Sep (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Saab 05-Sep (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2001 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I. 2001 Saab 05-Sep has automatic transmission and 1962 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1962 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Saab 05-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mini MK I | 2001 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Mini | Saab |
Model | MK I | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |