1962 Mini MK I vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2003 Spyker C8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Spyker C8 weights approximately 735 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I.
Because 2003 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mini MK I | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Mini | Spyker |
Model | MK I | C8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3999 cc |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |