1962 Mini MK I vs. 2009 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I.
Because 2009 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mini MK I | 2009 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Mini | Nissan |
Model | MK I | 350Z |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |