1962 Mini MK I vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (367 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER weights approximately 1237 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (542 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER has automatic transmission and 1962 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1962 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mini MK I | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Mini | Dodge |
Model | MK I | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 367 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1449 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2946 mm |