1962 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 2001 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2001 Ford Windstar is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1962 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1962 Mitsubishi 500.
Because 1962 Mitsubishi 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mitsubishi 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mitsubishi 500 | 2001 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | 500 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 594 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 23 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 3066 mm |
