1962 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1962 Mitsubishi 500.
Because 1962 Mitsubishi 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mitsubishi 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mitsubishi 500 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | 500 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 594 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 23 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2360 mm |
