1962 Mitsubishi A10 vs. 1984 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 1984 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mitsubishi A10 | 1984 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
| Model | A10 | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1984 |
| Engine Size | 491 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3150 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2570 mm |
