1962 Mitsubishi A10 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 976 kg more than 1962 Mitsubishi A10.
Because 1962 Mitsubishi A10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mitsubishi A10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mitsubishi A10 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | A10 | C30 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 491 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 475 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3150 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2639 mm |