1962 Morgan 4 vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1970 Triumph 1300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,340 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 1300 (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300 should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Morgan 4 | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Morgan | Triumph |
Model | 4 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2460 mm |