1962 Morgan 4 vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Subaru Forester (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru Forester weights approximately 730 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Morgan 4 | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Morgan | Subaru |
| Model | 4 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |
