1962 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Morgan 4 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Morgan | Renault |
Model | 4 | Megane |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2690 mm |