1962 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 791 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Morgan 4 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Morgan | Volvo |
Model | 4 | C30 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2639 mm |