1962 Morgan 4 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1454 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Morgan 4 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Morgan | Jeep |
Model | 4 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2916 mm |