1962 Morgan 4 vs. 2013 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2013 Toyota Avalon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Avalon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Avalon (264 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Avalon should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Avalon weights approximately 948 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Avalon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Morgan 4 | 2013 Toyota Avalon | |
| Make | Morgan | Toyota |
| Model | 4 | Avalon |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 264 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1608 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1835 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2820 mm |
