1962 Morris Minor vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Triumph 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morris Minor would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1962 Morris Minor. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1962 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1962 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Morris Minor. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1974 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Morris Minor | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Morris | Triumph |
Model | Minor | 2000 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2700 mm |