1962 Morris Minor vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1976 Toyota Mark II is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morris Minor would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Toyota Mark II (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1962 Morris Minor. (35 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1962 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 370 kg more than 1962 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Morris Minor. (67 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Morris Minor | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Morris | Toyota |
Model | Minor | Mark II |
Year Released | 1962 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 67 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2590 mm |