1962 Morris Minor vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morris Minor would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 340 more horse power than 1962 Morris Minor. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 Morris Minor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Morris Minor. (81 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Morris Minor | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Morris | Ford |
Model | Minor | Falcon |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 387 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 520 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 68 L |