1962 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 218 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
| Model | Bluebird | XF |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 271 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2908 mm |
