1962 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (54 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 550 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Nissan | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Bluebird | Colt |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2500 mm |
