1962 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 556 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | C30 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2639 mm |
