1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 1965 Volvo 120
To start off, 1965 Volvo 120 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Volvo 120 (67 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Volvo 120 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Volvo 120 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1965 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Nissan Cedric | 1965 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | 120 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |