1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 1980 Zastava 750
To start off, 1980 Zastava 750 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1962 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Cedric | 1980 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | Cedric | 750 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 51 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2010 mm |
