1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Cedric | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Cedric | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4690 mm |
