1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 1998 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 1998 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 108 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1962 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Cedric | 1998 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Nissan | Seat |
| Model | Cedric | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1038 kg |
