1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 1998 Skoda Felicia
To start off, 1998 Skoda Felicia is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Skoda Felicia (67 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Skoda Felicia should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Skoda Felicia weights approximately 45 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Skoda Felicia. (100 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1962 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Skoda Felicia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Cedric | 1998 Skoda Felicia | |
| Make | Nissan | Skoda |
| Model | Cedric | Felicia |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2460 mm |
