1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 1999 Acura TL
To start off, 1999 Acura TL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura TL weights approximately 645 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Acura TL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Cedric | 1999 Acura TL | |
| Make | Nissan | Acura |
| Model | Cedric | TL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 294 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
