1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1520 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Cedric | Park Ward |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 499 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3360 mm |