1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (230 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Renault Clio weights approximately 770 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1962 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Nissan Cedric | 2001 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Cedric | Clio |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
