1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2003 Toyota Echo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Echo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Echo (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Echo weights approximately 80 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Echo (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Echo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Toyota Echo | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Echo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2590 mm |