1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2008 Toyota Highlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1651 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Highlander (336 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Highlander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3546 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2581 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2800 mm |