1962 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Audi A6
To start off, 2011 Audi A6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A6 (300 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi A6 weights approximately 940 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi A6 (420 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Audi A6 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Cedric | A6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1458 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2842 mm |