1962 Peugeot 403 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Peugeot 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Peugeot 403 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Peugeot 403 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForFour (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1962 Peugeot 403. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1962 Peugeot 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Peugeot 403 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Because 1962 Peugeot 403 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Peugeot 403. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Peugeot 403 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Peugeot | Smart |
Model | 403 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |