1962 Peugeot 403 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Peugeot 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Peugeot 403 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1962 Peugeot 403. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1962 Peugeot 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 490 kg more than 1962 Peugeot 403. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Peugeot 403. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Peugeot 403 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Peugeot | Toyota |
| Model | 403 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
