1962 Peugeot 404 vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 1,816 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Peugeot 404 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Peugeot 404 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2010 Honda Fit.
Because 1962 Peugeot 404 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Peugeot 404. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Peugeot 404 | 2010 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Peugeot | Honda |
| Model | 404 | Fit |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1816 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 117 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1524 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2499 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 40 L |
