1962 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2003 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2003 Renault Koleos is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Renault Koleos. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Koleos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Koleos weights approximately 945 kg more than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2003 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Koleos. (105 Nm). This means 1962 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Koleos.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Reliant Sabre Six | 2003 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Reliant | Renault |
Model | Sabre Six | Koleos |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1761 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |